There are multiple interpretive events, or like ways to create meaning.
One of those is ritualistic bad faith, or just bad faith, or Power rituals or however you want to say it - if you’ve met a narcissist you’ve seen it.
So being able to identify and label this at that level is going to be much more important than treating bad faith in good faith and going about engaging with it - it will also affect you, you will be psychically polluted by the nonsense, especially if you grant it the legitimacy of rebuttal.
You need to, firstly, as the primary lens, assert whether the actor is in good faith or bad. If bad faith - even if you nominally agree with what they say - you must NEVER agree, on ANY level.
Play the fool, the trickster, the subversive, or whatever else - IF they are fundamentally a bad faith actor.
If you DISAGREE, but they are a good faith actor - you should engage. Even if you violently disagree - if they genuinely believe what they’re saying - it is worth engaging.
But you will be triggered to respond to the bad actor and you have to avoid that impulse.
What a load of old Grok. This post by TK, if it could be called that, is a contemporary example of the kind of hallucinatory actions that can occur when a generative AI output is not validated...... it's effectively sub pap.
I don’t agree. Denton and Gorton is a long held Labour stronghold. Half the electorate did not vote. That’s why the Greens won, also by appealing to the Muslim vote which used to go to Labour. If white British people fail to vote then they will be taken over by the Muslims. Personally I believe that all this leads inevitably to civil war. And the white British will be forced into action to defend themselves.
Restore Britain's one man band is storing up serious problems for its future if it now even has one?
Policy is fine, but details are disastrous as they allow the opposition to pick holes and interminably delay.
Detailing the few objectives that can be changed in a 1st term whilst suggesting changes further down the line, seems sensible.
This is the incorrect way to handle this.
There are multiple interpretive events, or like ways to create meaning.
One of those is ritualistic bad faith, or just bad faith, or Power rituals or however you want to say it - if you’ve met a narcissist you’ve seen it.
So being able to identify and label this at that level is going to be much more important than treating bad faith in good faith and going about engaging with it - it will also affect you, you will be psychically polluted by the nonsense, especially if you grant it the legitimacy of rebuttal.
You need to, firstly, as the primary lens, assert whether the actor is in good faith or bad. If bad faith - even if you nominally agree with what they say - you must NEVER agree, on ANY level.
Play the fool, the trickster, the subversive, or whatever else - IF they are fundamentally a bad faith actor.
If you DISAGREE, but they are a good faith actor - you should engage. Even if you violently disagree - if they genuinely believe what they’re saying - it is worth engaging.
But you will be triggered to respond to the bad actor and you have to avoid that impulse.
What a load of old Grok. This post by TK, if it could be called that, is a contemporary example of the kind of hallucinatory actions that can occur when a generative AI output is not validated...... it's effectively sub pap.
So I'm saying something, and you're not saying anything.
"Capital Hill is Israeli occupied territory".
~ Patrick Buchanan
Looking forward to the NeoCon Zi0 warmongers on the Right each taking in a refugee from Iran, if this ends like Afghanistan, Syria Libya or Iraq.
I don’t agree. Denton and Gorton is a long held Labour stronghold. Half the electorate did not vote. That’s why the Greens won, also by appealing to the Muslim vote which used to go to Labour. If white British people fail to vote then they will be taken over by the Muslims. Personally I believe that all this leads inevitably to civil war. And the white British will be forced into action to defend themselves.