I think she subscribes to your newsletter. This is excellent news to anyone seriously worried about Britain's future and with no faith in the gaggle of Frank Spencers in Reform.
Things are going to get much worse over the next few years and Labour (justifiably) will be blamed, with the Tory’s sharing that blame for their considerable previous contribution.
The public won’t swap between the Unipartys two stalwarts again - even if Reform has no policies other than ‘send them back’.
The ECHR is voluntary but the UK Parliament and judiciary regard it as superior to British law.
Control of law in the UK is handed to a foreign court.
If that’s not sufficiently alarming, those presiding over the ECHR do not need legal training.
If the head of a major political party in the UK does not ‘understand’ anything wouldn’t it be sensible to obtain that understanding prior to discussing it?
From my experience and their previous actions, they have their plan and they will stick to it. Leaving ECHR is not part of the ‘globalist’ plan. I may be wrong but I don’t trust them for good reason, they are all first and foremost, liars. It is just their cultlike modus operandi, to falsify and lead on, and they haven’t strayed from it in my lifetime. Even Trumps doing it now, they’re calling him TACO in the states: Trump Always Chickens Out.
Everything they say is to quell our fear of existential oblivion, to keep us subdued, and their plan marches on.
Grasping at straws therefore drowning. A White Russian in Paris between the world wars would have come up with such an argument. An election winning Party needs to come up with voting support from over 10 million people, preferably 12-13m and that comes from the pub, club, High St who don't care or even know much about the ECHR. They who idly await Kemi's inevitable defenestration, wonder why Jenrick's the best they can come up with. They who take their car in for repair with little or no interest in what the tools used or torque settings of the bolts are.
Over the next year or two the by elections will multiply. Among them, where Reform don't win. some Tory big guns will be resurrected, JRM the first in the Dan Norris seat I imagine. KB will, should, be gone and the dynamic will change. Why do Sunak, Davies, Dowden, IDS, Hunt sit so quietly? Surely they should retire but hold for fear of handing over their constituencies to Reform while tempers are high. Or are they waiting? They inject nothing. They lack a Messiah, and not Boris or Truss. They've got Patel and Stride up front doing little but hold the fort and the remainder are unknown, invisible.
The mood will relax, Reform have to overcome their lack of ministerial experience and some accommodation may be reached if only to eject the folly of the present government.
This is an interesting development, as you said. She's clearly adopted a "slow and steady" approach, letting Jenrick, Lam, Kruger, Timothy and a few others lead on single issues while she quietly leads from the back. And I'm certainly not a fan of Reform's tub thumping and flip flopping between being left wing and right wing. Slopulism is a very apt term and their supporters are so rubbish they think that abusing people who have legitimate criticisms is the way to go...well, try that on the doorsteps and see where that gets you. Reform can only survive on the fuel of voter resentment towards the other parties for the short-medium term. At some point that will diminish and they'd better have a different message other than "we're not them".
I can see, but can't prove, that the Conservatives are prepared to be vilified, insulted, have brickbats thrown at them and even be told over and over that they're doomed for the next 2 years. 2029 is still a way off and they might be aiming for a turnaround of fortunes in 2027, as Reform led councils run by amateurs find that tub thumping doesn't fix potholes and Labour up their nasty game aimed at them. And can Farage assemble a shadow cabinet? It's telling that none of the Reform MPs have a policy area they specialise in. Even the LibDems can manage that.
I doubt it will happen but the Tories could re-boot themselves and outflank Reform by brining in Rupert Lowe and promoting Jenrick. Some of the wets will leave and can take the blame for 14 years of failure. The Tories won’t win but can stay in the game for long enough in a contest with Reform which will benefit both parties. Competition will dominate the agenda and squeeze out the left which will be all over the place in the economic winter we’re heading into. Most constituencies will self-select into Tory and Reform seats - why would fight for its deposit just to keep the other out and let Labour back in?
I think she subscribes to your newsletter. This is excellent news to anyone seriously worried about Britain's future and with no faith in the gaggle of Frank Spencers in Reform.
Reality.
Things are going to get much worse over the next few years and Labour (justifiably) will be blamed, with the Tory’s sharing that blame for their considerable previous contribution.
The public won’t swap between the Unipartys two stalwarts again - even if Reform has no policies other than ‘send them back’.
Suicide is not an option.
To regain trust the Tories will need to send for Hercules.
… or Rupert?
‘We need to understand’?
The ECHR is voluntary but the UK Parliament and judiciary regard it as superior to British law.
Control of law in the UK is handed to a foreign court.
If that’s not sufficiently alarming, those presiding over the ECHR do not need legal training.
If the head of a major political party in the UK does not ‘understand’ anything wouldn’t it be sensible to obtain that understanding prior to discussing it?
‘We need to understand’?
The words of a mealy mouthed charlatan.
Don’t waste your time - their Uniparty.
No
From my experience and their previous actions, they have their plan and they will stick to it. Leaving ECHR is not part of the ‘globalist’ plan. I may be wrong but I don’t trust them for good reason, they are all first and foremost, liars. It is just their cultlike modus operandi, to falsify and lead on, and they haven’t strayed from it in my lifetime. Even Trumps doing it now, they’re calling him TACO in the states: Trump Always Chickens Out.
Everything they say is to quell our fear of existential oblivion, to keep us subdued, and their plan marches on.
Grasping at straws therefore drowning. A White Russian in Paris between the world wars would have come up with such an argument. An election winning Party needs to come up with voting support from over 10 million people, preferably 12-13m and that comes from the pub, club, High St who don't care or even know much about the ECHR. They who idly await Kemi's inevitable defenestration, wonder why Jenrick's the best they can come up with. They who take their car in for repair with little or no interest in what the tools used or torque settings of the bolts are.
Over the next year or two the by elections will multiply. Among them, where Reform don't win. some Tory big guns will be resurrected, JRM the first in the Dan Norris seat I imagine. KB will, should, be gone and the dynamic will change. Why do Sunak, Davies, Dowden, IDS, Hunt sit so quietly? Surely they should retire but hold for fear of handing over their constituencies to Reform while tempers are high. Or are they waiting? They inject nothing. They lack a Messiah, and not Boris or Truss. They've got Patel and Stride up front doing little but hold the fort and the remainder are unknown, invisible.
The mood will relax, Reform have to overcome their lack of ministerial experience and some accommodation may be reached if only to eject the folly of the present government.
This is an interesting development, as you said. She's clearly adopted a "slow and steady" approach, letting Jenrick, Lam, Kruger, Timothy and a few others lead on single issues while she quietly leads from the back. And I'm certainly not a fan of Reform's tub thumping and flip flopping between being left wing and right wing. Slopulism is a very apt term and their supporters are so rubbish they think that abusing people who have legitimate criticisms is the way to go...well, try that on the doorsteps and see where that gets you. Reform can only survive on the fuel of voter resentment towards the other parties for the short-medium term. At some point that will diminish and they'd better have a different message other than "we're not them".
I can see, but can't prove, that the Conservatives are prepared to be vilified, insulted, have brickbats thrown at them and even be told over and over that they're doomed for the next 2 years. 2029 is still a way off and they might be aiming for a turnaround of fortunes in 2027, as Reform led councils run by amateurs find that tub thumping doesn't fix potholes and Labour up their nasty game aimed at them. And can Farage assemble a shadow cabinet? It's telling that none of the Reform MPs have a policy area they specialise in. Even the LibDems can manage that.
I doubt it will happen but the Tories could re-boot themselves and outflank Reform by brining in Rupert Lowe and promoting Jenrick. Some of the wets will leave and can take the blame for 14 years of failure. The Tories won’t win but can stay in the game for long enough in a contest with Reform which will benefit both parties. Competition will dominate the agenda and squeeze out the left which will be all over the place in the economic winter we’re heading into. Most constituencies will self-select into Tory and Reform seats - why would fight for its deposit just to keep the other out and let Labour back in?
To de-ignite our warrior spirit,
they give words to our grievances from on higher whilst pouring water on our fire,
they verbally recognise our pain to carefully douse our flame,
they anaesthatise our wound by oration and rhetoric,
but they do not act upon it
This…Aarhus…I know nothing of it, so that’s some homework for me to do. :)