I started watching it last night, but the audio wasn't great and the non-english speakers difficult to follow, so I gave up. Surely it would be more useful for Harrison to concentrate on the British situation, as there is more than enough to do here?
Pitt's a strange cove but looking at the state of the online Right Wing commentariat he's not alone in that. Alarm bells started ringing for me back in his early New Culture Forum days where he would always dip his toes into the authoritarian pond but being careful to say just a few sensible things and couch his more outlandish ideas in harmless sounding jargon. But inviting the Academic Agent on to his show on more than one occasion is a serious red flag as AA has never encountered a despot he didn't admire. Pitt is now one of the strange bunch of Trad-Caths who are torn between having a restoration of a Stuart monarchy or an Oliver Cromwell "muh strong man" leader and his thoughts are influenced by Hobbes' Leviathan, Spengler, Evola and the rest of that ilk. He sounds intellectual but it's all "muh strong man" at the end of the day. That he's trumpeting some pan-European ethnically based think tank tells me he'll end up advocating for a Catholic European Union based on race and doing away with people who he disapproves of. The podcaster to authoritarian plughole is alive with him.
That's me to a tee: a 90s Liberal. I haven't moved right, I'm still exactly where I was: freedom of speech; equality before the national common law as established by centuries of precedent. Simples? Not any more. I don't give a literally a fuck for your putative identity or sexual deviance quotient as long as you keep it to yourself. But I do draw the line the insidious insertion of foreign and religious law. Ethno-sectarianism is a non-starter - it's about national culture, not race. Nana Akua is a lovely lady, but she's not Anglo - and that doesn't matter because she's as British as they come. If you want to be a British citizen: observe British law, respect others, speak English, hold down a job and contribute to a high-trust society. Otherwise, find somewhere else to indulge your paranoid grievances, parasitic tendencies and primitive religion
The Right needs to learn the lesson that as I've said before piss poor planning makes for piss poor performance.
I started watching it last night, but the audio wasn't great and the non-english speakers difficult to follow, so I gave up. Surely it would be more useful for Harrison to concentrate on the British situation, as there is more than enough to do here?
He’s just done an interview on Nick Dixon’s Current Thing that covers British ground, not heard it yet though.
Excellent. Totally agree. Very well argued.
Pitt's a strange cove but looking at the state of the online Right Wing commentariat he's not alone in that. Alarm bells started ringing for me back in his early New Culture Forum days where he would always dip his toes into the authoritarian pond but being careful to say just a few sensible things and couch his more outlandish ideas in harmless sounding jargon. But inviting the Academic Agent on to his show on more than one occasion is a serious red flag as AA has never encountered a despot he didn't admire. Pitt is now one of the strange bunch of Trad-Caths who are torn between having a restoration of a Stuart monarchy or an Oliver Cromwell "muh strong man" leader and his thoughts are influenced by Hobbes' Leviathan, Spengler, Evola and the rest of that ilk. He sounds intellectual but it's all "muh strong man" at the end of the day. That he's trumpeting some pan-European ethnically based think tank tells me he'll end up advocating for a Catholic European Union based on race and doing away with people who he disapproves of. The podcaster to authoritarian plughole is alive with him.
That's me to a tee: a 90s Liberal. I haven't moved right, I'm still exactly where I was: freedom of speech; equality before the national common law as established by centuries of precedent. Simples? Not any more. I don't give a literally a fuck for your putative identity or sexual deviance quotient as long as you keep it to yourself. But I do draw the line the insidious insertion of foreign and religious law. Ethno-sectarianism is a non-starter - it's about national culture, not race. Nana Akua is a lovely lady, but she's not Anglo - and that doesn't matter because she's as British as they come. If you want to be a British citizen: observe British law, respect others, speak English, hold down a job and contribute to a high-trust society. Otherwise, find somewhere else to indulge your paranoid grievances, parasitic tendencies and primitive religion