Tone-deaf Starmer is playing with fire

In Keir Starmer's second intervention on the current disorder, he was not willing to entertain the idea that there could be any legitimate sentiment behind it. And, you know, I might even have saluted him for that, if he meant that nothing we're seeing could excuse or justify thuggery.

But there's two things wrong here. It's entirely selective. Some doped up criminal croaks it in a bodged arrest in a foreign country, and Starmer thinks it's entirely legitimate for blacks to kick off in London's suburbs - to such an extent that he and the entire London Met grovel before them on one knee.

Then today, there is no acknowledgment whatsoever that Islamist mobs, whose votes he holds dear, are on the march. Only the "far right" is worth a mention. Starmer thinks we're the problem because we've reached our limit for third world butchery on our streets.

From this we can safely assume there will be zero introspection, and no handouts for community groups where white girls are preyed upon by Muslim perverts. No "engagement with community leaders". No reappraisal of the migrant amnesty, no change in where they are housed. It's all stick and no carrot.

Then come the next election, Starmer and Co will be out grovelling at the feet of foreigners, rearranging our foreign policy to suit, and taking the Muslim manifesto into serious consideration. Starmer has picked a side and it isn't ours. He's now laying down the law that we are not entitled to object or protest. We are supposed to sit quietly, do as we're told, and go along with the pretence that everything's fine.

Only everything isn't fine. We are very far from fine. Starmer has had his answer. We have every right to speak out. We have every right to protest. And Starmer has no right to expect that the contempt he shows us will not be reciprocated. Today he doubled down on that contempt he holds for all of us. The people will respond accordingly.

Meanwhile, with tiresome predictably, Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage are singled out for blame - rather than decades of failed immigration policy.

As one tweeter, Paul Fanning, puts it, “The thing I've found interesting today is the way the 'nice' people are shocked and horrified because the thing that was always going to happen - that they've been repeatedly told would happen, in fact - has had the temerity to happen. And they're really struggling to process that the nasty people with horrid views who warned them it would happen have been proved right again. So, in the throes of their cognitive dissonance, they're lashing out.”

It would actually shock them to learn that nobody at this point gives a tinker’s toss what Farage said. He could have said "Please everyone, let's wait for the facts before leaping to conclusions, and let the police do their jobs", and there'd still have been a riot because we all know how this works now. Something monstrous happens, candles are lit, vigils are held, and buildings are lit up, and then it's brushed under the carpet. Nobody is ever to blame; no-one and nothing is responsible. It's just another one of those things that just happens.

Only things like this don't just happen. Or at least they didn't used to. Things like this happen when you flood a first world civilisation with subliterate third world savages. And that didn't happen by accident. That was a very deliberate decision on the part of our rulers, and they did it without our consent, knowing full well we didn't want it.

They gaslit us while they did it, they laughed in our faces, and then called us racist. So there is one giant mystery here, isn't there? Why did we not riot sooner? There's at least a dozen occasions in the last five years where we should have burned the sky and crucified our politicians.

Frankly, the British people have shown extraordinary restraint today - though god knows why. It's not as though the establishment is going to listen or do anything, and we're supposed to just forget that we saw armed squads of Islamists marching through our towns. Sorry, no. That's not happening. We noticed.

Writing in The New European, Harrison Pitt of New Culture Forum surrounds it quite nicely:

“To put it in simple terms, we never voted to be demographically replaced—least of all by groups with a higher propensity for committing acts of violence. In just the last week or so, we have seen a British soldier nearly stabbed to death by a Nigerian called Anthony Esan, a policewoman punched in the face by Pakistani youths in Manchester, and machete brawls in Southend. Throughout July, we were also treated to Bangladeshi riots in London, Romani and South Asian lawlessness in Leeds, and Muslim protests outside a police station in solidarity with the very Pakistanis who had attacked officers at Manchester Airport”.

It would be absurd, says Pitt, to tar all members of any group with the same brush. “However, it is equally absurd—and a grave danger—for those with a sworn duty to keep us safe to maintain the delusion that a randomised sample of military-aged male Rwandans, Somalis, and Pakistanis (especially if we include those willing to pay criminal gangs to smuggle them illegally into our homelands) will be identical to a randomised sample of Swissmen, Danes, and South Koreans. Anyone who clutches their pearls at such obvious truths simply exposes himself as a fanatic who cares more about betting the house on human nature than ensuring the safety of our women and girls”.

But this is simply beyond Keir Starmer’s comprehension. With Starmer and the left, you have to understand that, to them, multicultural utopia is within our grasp. The only obstacle to it is the racism of working class white people, which is something to be managed and nudged out of existence. This rioting is a rejection of their entire ethos, thus we must be punished like naughty children.

The rest of his term will now be devoted to forbidding the British people from noticing what is done to us. We’ve never had a say in it before, and that’s not about to change. As such, Starmer is playing with fire. There is no reconciliation now. The divisions are permanent and structural - and this does not end well.