Shabana Mahmood has announced a Ukrainian-style sponsorship scheme for households and communities to bring thousands of refugees to the UK from conflict zones around the world.
Cunning bait and switch from Mahmoud (does her hair style intentionally look like a hijab?). Linton on Ouse is in my MP’s constituency and both he and Farage have spoken against it, for the little that is worth. But there should be protests, big and ugly if necessary.
Utterly baffling. It's an act of state vandalism that holds two fat fingers up to the working-class that Labour purports to represent. It begs the question: Why on earth would they want to do this? They must have realised by now that they can't rely on imported votes. The only vaguely half-plausible answer is that they want to indicate to international lenders that the UK has an even larger, highly taxable population - indicating that they intend to continue their unsustainable borrowing spree. Utter madness, and should hold severe legal consequences for those involved.
Rupert Lowe being the only person to put forward a definite plan to counter these treasonous acts by the British politicians, yet you rejoice in shooting him down, repeatedly. Do you see a knight in silver armour beyond the horizon?
This is probably partly because the Government of the UK signed up to the UN Compact on managed migration. As far as I know, Australia did not sign up to that.
The Government wants to provoke violence so that they can clamp down on it, make examples of ringleaders (or anyone they can fit up as such), and beef up authoritarian state surveillance until none of us can move without being approved conformist or labelled a threat. Demos are useless: the Police are all geared up to kettle, document and prosecute, as well as organising opposing rent-a-mobs. Protest must be non-violent, but undermine state control. A General Strike would be ideal, but the Unions have long been suborned. Perhaps a collective refusal to pay selected taxes?
Cunning bait and switch from Mahmoud (does her hair style intentionally look like a hijab?). Linton on Ouse is in my MP’s constituency and both he and Farage have spoken against it, for the little that is worth. But there should be protests, big and ugly if necessary.
Very strong words from you there, Peter, but I realise that everyone has a breaking point.
You are, of course, correct. This is a very deliberate assault on our nation and identity, Fabian in design and fatalistic in nature.
This certainly will be met with the contempt it deserves
Impotent contempt, that is
They should all be arrested and tried for treason
Utterly baffling. It's an act of state vandalism that holds two fat fingers up to the working-class that Labour purports to represent. It begs the question: Why on earth would they want to do this? They must have realised by now that they can't rely on imported votes. The only vaguely half-plausible answer is that they want to indicate to international lenders that the UK has an even larger, highly taxable population - indicating that they intend to continue their unsustainable borrowing spree. Utter madness, and should hold severe legal consequences for those involved.
Rupert Lowe being the only person to put forward a definite plan to counter these treasonous acts by the British politicians, yet you rejoice in shooting him down, repeatedly. Do you see a knight in silver armour beyond the horizon?
But you/we have to face the reality that Lowe's Restore party is now in trouble and is not going to be anywhere near power.
This is probably partly because the Government of the UK signed up to the UN Compact on managed migration. As far as I know, Australia did not sign up to that.
Yup and no one has mentioned this in parliament
What did we expect? It's no different to what Fat Al and the ConTories were imposing on us.
The current Home Secretary is in many respects not one of us having been born to migrant parents in 1980.
Do you think a Brit born to British parents in Pakistan would end up as their Interior Secretary to Pakistan?
The Government wants to provoke violence so that they can clamp down on it, make examples of ringleaders (or anyone they can fit up as such), and beef up authoritarian state surveillance until none of us can move without being approved conformist or labelled a threat. Demos are useless: the Police are all geared up to kettle, document and prosecute, as well as organising opposing rent-a-mobs. Protest must be non-violent, but undermine state control. A General Strike would be ideal, but the Unions have long been suborned. Perhaps a collective refusal to pay selected taxes?
A system is what it does.