12 Comments
User's avatar
Dan Richardson's avatar

Went to a garden party thing today, and people, actual normal/non political people were talking about migration in a way that just didn't happen a couple of years back. I'm hoping the tide is finally turning.

Expand full comment
Simon Neale's avatar

Very nice article, soundly argued. Keep going, and keep us informed. All the best.

Expand full comment
Nicholas Craddy's avatar

Hi PN, thanks for the update

Expand full comment
george hancock's avatar

I’m all for remigration and removal of migrants who are economically burdensome to the tax payer.

But the basis of the economy requires fundamental change too.

An economy based on house valuations is one of the main reasons for low birth rates.

If you worry about bills and high property prices, having kids slips down the list of priorities.

The economy is failing - as it was meant to.

Going begging to the IMF is a deliberate intention.

The IMF makes our decisions - then the WEF and EU take control.

We are in deep trouble.

Expand full comment
Stuart Worthington's avatar

And as always, the costs come out of normal taxation meaning, we pay for the privelage with STAMMER, Labour and remainers are happy with the EUSSR/ WEF gaining control again.

Expand full comment
Nicholas Hughes's avatar

Your article comes a week after Steve Laws' announcement that he's leaving Homeland...I've never had much time for Laws, who I see as continuity BNP/NF/BUF, and in his statement he's blaming a softening within Homeland but in my opinion that had to happen and a reckoning with the authoritarian and blatantly racist and antisemitic wing of the party was inevitable. British fascism has always been a farce and ineffectual and no good can come from dallying in it. I will watch with interest how Homeland will go from here.

Expand full comment
Daz Pearce's avatar

it seems you've managed to avoid some of the excesses of an outfit like this, namely the proclivity for boot boys, thugs, wrong uns etc. For the sake of your sanity and online reputation I hope that lasts.

As for remigration as a policy it's impossible not to worry about the scope of the State creating a far nastier problem than a few illegals where you live. It could easily become the vehicle for a dystopian hellhole...

Expand full comment
Andrew Fairfoull's avatar

Pete, I’m considering joining Homeland. I’m very pro Jewish though. What’s Homeland’s policy on Israel?

Expand full comment
Pete North's avatar

I detest antisemitism and I have a track record of speaking out against it, and will continue to do so. The party, though, has a diversity of views in the ranks. Since the conflict is irrelevant to our policy platform, we have no position either way. Our policy is remigration. Remigration is self-selecting, non-discriminatory and voluntary. Remigration extends to closing down multiculturalism – where we no longer tolerate Sharia courts and non-stun slaughter. By extension, that applies to Jewish equivalents. If we make carve-outs for one faith then we set the precedent for other faiths to lobby for likewise. If there is an encoded definition of antisemitism, why would Muslims not press for a legal construct of Islamophobia? If you are serious about ending multiculturalism, there can be no exceptions.

The Homeland Party does not single out Jews or Muslims or anybody else. We seek to govern Britain as a homeland in the interests of our own people. Those who marry into our tribe become part of us, and they are entitled to their private beliefs and religious observances in the home, but the British people are not obliged to accommodate, or make special provisions, for those who wish to live separately according to their own laws and customs.

Expand full comment
Nicholas Craddy's avatar

Spot on

Expand full comment
Mr. Simon Field's avatar

The OBR recently revealed you average non-white is “fiscally negative” to the tune of -£483,000 (that assumes they dont commit a crime and have no dependents). Had they included the strong change they would reproduce and the high likelihood they would end up on the wrong side of the law…the - £483,000 would have been eye-wateringly large.

Put simply; the average black consumes -£483,000 of OUR stuff (assuming a lifespan on 81 years).

Obviously…if EVERYONE was a MINUS $XYZ, UK plc would have gone broke years ago. We are close to that right now.

This means some people need to be fiscally POSITIVE AND YES THOSE PEOPLE ARE WHITE ENGLISH

THIS MEANS WE ARE THE SLAVES TO THESE NIGGERS.

WHO AGREED TO THIS? WHO AGREED TO A INTERRACIAL WEALTH TRANSFER FROM WHITES TO BLACKS….WHO HATE US? We give them our cash and they target ius and our children for violence and rape. We need a RACE WAR.

WHAT RIGHT DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE TO TAKE OUR DIME AND HAND IT TO SOME CUNT THAT HAS JUST CLEARED CUSTOMS THAT WANTS TO RAPE OUR CHILDREN?

FUCK BLACK PEOPLE. THEY ARE PARASITES AND THE PARASITE IS NEVER NICE TO THE HOST - IT KILLS IT.

We have tried being nice. You cant deal with a rat and a vermin infestation by leaving out cheese and snacks. You have to poison the fucking things and incinerate them.

How has been nice and not racist worked out then? I dont see a political solution to this.

There is a race war going on…we are not fighting back. That has to change..or we are fucked.

Expand full comment
John Sampson's avatar

This comment shows why people are likely to be dubious about the Homeland party.

Expand full comment