I should engage more on here and I will, but I've have to split my time between several platforms. Though correct me if I'm wrong, I've banned you before on account of your abuse and demanding tone, which is probably why I haven't responded to you. I take endless shit on X but I don't have to accept it here.
A conversation at last. I've never abused you, or anyone unless they are over sensitive. You put forward your ideas, expect them to be questioned. If you preach to the converted, speak to them, the alternatives will never be persuaded if you don't engage. If you over reach with too many platforms what do you hope to achieve? I've remarked on the substack world in general before - lonely voices in the dark - you write yourself about organised politics but who else are you allied with that is of any interest to the average reader? Why don't you engage with The Conservative Woman? Freespeechbacklash.com? TGIOF?
You want £6 a month for no chat and offer what?. I won't bother you anymore.
Yes, I agree that your posts have been interesting recently, particularly on the need to enforce the laws and rules that we already have in place. However, not so long ago you seemed to be blaming baby boomers for all the country's ills, and for that reason I'm unsure whether to resubscribe.
Pete, I think that, while you may be correct in everything you say, if every time you say anything it is that 'this shit won't work', what is the point? Your subscribers are looking for more than that. We could all do that, although the level of detail you show is extraordinary, and you point out things that most of us would not know, especially what goes on behind the scenes.
I think it might help if you diverge sometimes from the 'this is a waste of effort' view and say something encouraging. I don't know. I'd hate to lose you, but I get frustrated sometimes when every single published piece is relentlessly negative.
We need an amateur dissident Right think tank with many heads and diverse backgrounds and perspectives, both ethnonationalist and civic/cultural nationalist. That is my humble opinion on the way forward on the policy front.
There's not much wrong in being thorough. My only advice to you, and you've learned this in recent months, is be careful who you talk with on the Dissident Right.
You're worth every penny and I'll chat shortly to see what more I can do.
Acknowledge your comments if you want to keep engagement going. You answer no one. A soapbox.
I should engage more on here and I will, but I've have to split my time between several platforms. Though correct me if I'm wrong, I've banned you before on account of your abuse and demanding tone, which is probably why I haven't responded to you. I take endless shit on X but I don't have to accept it here.
A conversation at last. I've never abused you, or anyone unless they are over sensitive. You put forward your ideas, expect them to be questioned. If you preach to the converted, speak to them, the alternatives will never be persuaded if you don't engage. If you over reach with too many platforms what do you hope to achieve? I've remarked on the substack world in general before - lonely voices in the dark - you write yourself about organised politics but who else are you allied with that is of any interest to the average reader? Why don't you engage with The Conservative Woman? Freespeechbacklash.com? TGIOF?
You want £6 a month for no chat and offer what?. I won't bother you anymore.
Yes, I agree that your posts have been interesting recently, particularly on the need to enforce the laws and rules that we already have in place. However, not so long ago you seemed to be blaming baby boomers for all the country's ills, and for that reason I'm unsure whether to resubscribe.
Pete, I think that, while you may be correct in everything you say, if every time you say anything it is that 'this shit won't work', what is the point? Your subscribers are looking for more than that. We could all do that, although the level of detail you show is extraordinary, and you point out things that most of us would not know, especially what goes on behind the scenes.
I think it might help if you diverge sometimes from the 'this is a waste of effort' view and say something encouraging. I don't know. I'd hate to lose you, but I get frustrated sometimes when every single published piece is relentlessly negative.
Keep going. (I'm in the SDP)
We need an amateur dissident Right think tank with many heads and diverse backgrounds and perspectives, both ethnonationalist and civic/cultural nationalist. That is my humble opinion on the way forward on the policy front.
There's not much wrong in being thorough. My only advice to you, and you've learned this in recent months, is be careful who you talk with on the Dissident Right.
No: talk to anyone. You might hear weird things but so what.
You need to keep your guard up. And no good can come from having dealings with the Academic Agent.