Someone is rashly optimistic today (spelling mistakes give the game away). Maybe you’re right. I expect enough of the media and midwit liberals will stay in check in terror of the rise of the far right to keep the show on the road for a while. Lenin stayed in power for 80 years without an economic recovery to boast of. Starmer is also helped by having no opposition - the far right on the internet doesn’t count. Harris may win and reinforce the narrative. On the other hand, Labour’s coalition is fragile. The woke, the Islamists and the chattering middle classes. The first two have other political homes. The last may turn when their lifestyles suffer. Maybe power cuts, and tent cities in Islington will do the trick. Who knows, but whatever happens will be unpleasant for all of us.
We await for the penny to drop for the midwit liberal social media commentators, regarding the nature of the "adults" and their "clients". Can't help thinking that they are revelling in the anarcho tyranny being visited on the working class tho. They lap up the slop think of "far right", it suits their lazy world view. All revenge for brexit I suppose, which acts as camo for their classism.
Labour are effectively mid-level bureaucrats in positions of political power. In the view of a bureaucrat there is no problem that cannot be solved by another form preferably completed in triplicate. Give them political power and there is no problem that cannot be solved by another law. They are completely out of their depth.
There is ample evidence that there are no serious grown ups in Westminster just low grade, preening, ignorant, out of touch, cosmetic, self-centred, cowardly, virtue signalling incompetents.
Yeah. There are no intellectuals of the calibre of Barbara Castle, Frank Field or Denis Healey left in the Labour Party. It says something when you consider that the intellectual heavyweight of the party is probably Wes Streeting. I'm living in hope that this awful Starmer regime is in fact the last flatulent whimper of the Labour party in the UK before they are consigned to the history books.
I’m increasingly of the same view as Peter Hitchens that both major parties are in their death throes. I don’t see a comeback for the Tories which is very worrying as Labour have to be removed, and Labour are destroying the country while they destroy themselves. Even in the week since this post was made we’ve plumbed new depths. This time foreign policy showing us to be an unreliable partner to Israel and the US which will come with a cost and Rayner’s thoughts on right to buy. Every time Labour touch something they manage to make it worse.
"You can't on the one hand tell the public ..." - Probably you can. Laura Dodsworth: '...a government advisor told me that the behavioural scientists are “very pleased with themselves” and “Britain is seen as leading the way in how to manipulate people. There is skipping in Whitehall corridors. The public have been proved to be incredibly sheepish..."'
I've always liked " things are never as good as you think they are - things are rarely as bad as you think they are".
Except, I fear that, given the current environment, thing's really are as bad as 'we' think they are.
I anticipate the current Muppet show or as Pete's father says ' regime' to get progressively worse - based on economic performance in the UK ( Reeve's being a genuine lightweight with little understanding of what growth measures are or how to achieve it) & those pesky external events in the EU & beyond but which have significantly more impact on the UK given the multiplier effects.
That things have gone so badly, so quickly for the Labour regime isn't a good portent - maybe it will be Red Ed , the bacon gurning energy secretary who will do for Labour given the exorbitant costs of imported energy and increasing lack of resilience in any form of energy generation.
Harold Macmillan’s maxim will do for Starmer. “Events, dear boy, events” will bring Starmer down, because he is not in control of ‘events. They will mount up and his hubris, authoritarianism and inflexibility will do for him.
If Sweden and Denmark are valid parallels, violent crimes against women will likely continue to rise.
The tax base will collapse as the 1 percent of tax payers who pay 30 percent of the tax take start to migrate. Even small numbers will, mathematically, have a disproportionate effect.
Energy prices will very likely continue to rise in price under Milibland.
A multi-EV fire in the basement of an upscale apartment block will burn so hot and so long it weakens the reinforced concrete pillars which form the foundations. This will create a toxic fallout zone and severe backlash from the insurance industry.
If all that comes true, my question is this: How does a government with a huge majority actually fall under our system? I really don't know the answer.
Unfortunately I think there’s only the answer that you already know which is that a government doesn’t fall through incompetence provided it can win no confidence votes. So they can only be removed at the next election. I’ve drafted some thoughts below on how we prepare for that and get this lot out. The Tories are becoming more electable every day Labour spend in office and Reform are the only ones with a sensible policy on immigration unless Jenrick wins for the Tories.
Jenrick is a "One Nation" Cameronite who is simply spouting what he thinks those still left as MPs want the party membership to hear. If he gets to lead the party it's straight back to the centrist/liberal democrat position which caused them to be wiped out in the first place.
Why did he resign as immigration Minister in Sunak’s government in that case? He’d hardly be calling to leave the ECHR if he was a Cameroon? People are entitled to change their minds and my judgement is that Jenrick has done that. Maybe I’m wrong but if I’m right he’s the best bet.
Much handwringing across the media as people realise we have unwittingly elected a Trotskyite communist to browbeat us all into submission. But what's worse is that their parliamentary majority will keep thin power for a full term and likely a second term since the Tory party has effectively been emasculated by the soft socialists who now control it.
We're doomed I'm afraid. I'm making plans to leave the UK before they bolt the door to stop the huge flight of people and capital out of the country.
Hugely dependent on whether you have kids or not. If you don't, the US might still be a good bet, especially if the Republicans win in November. Even if they don't, there will still be a large number of libertarian leaning (in politics and spirity) in that country for a long time. If you do have kids, there is the school vaccination schedule to reckon with.
All round, I reckon Japan may be a good long term bet - I expect they will be the first country in the developed world to exit the demographic crisis, hopefully unaided by third world immigration. Also it's a proper country unlike Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong and city state type places.
In Europe; Denmark or Norway. Sweden and Finland are too woke and have too many immigrants from undesirable countries.
Russia. Putin is offering temporary residency to any westerners who renounce the western liberal agenda. Previously, you had to learn some Russian in advance. That requirement has been dropped. I'm in the USA until the end of September. Then I'll looking seriously at moving to Russia on my return. There are some really interesting videos on YouTube of western people who are living there. Safe. clean, low crime, men are men, women are women. property and living essentials are affordable. It's not the gangster capitalist free for all that it was 20 years ago. Moscow and St Petersburg are modern cities with a functioning legal system.
Isn't Russia still Big Brother territory, where your card is marked for even minor dissent?
Don't forget the poison-tipped umbrellas. ;) If you upset someone there, retribution is swift. I just, but is it true that you elect the person to govern you that you're told to elect, or else? Was there any opposition to Putin?
I do admire Putin's stance on the liberal West. Our 'anything goes' tolerance has become our downfall, and yes, I feel I should urge my adult children to leave the oppressive dung-heap the UK is fast becoming. Starmer, in a few short weeks is the epitome of a tyrant.
As myself a British/Canadian, I suspect Canada may actually be a better bet than you think. An election is due in 15 months, which I really can't see Trudeau winning, and Poilievre's Canada is a much more enticing prospect than Starmer's Britain.
Hungary and the Baltic States? That’ll bring a new definition to “safe haven” when Putin invades! I agree with you that the other countries in five eyes are as off the wall crazy as us.
I worked in Moscow (travelling to a subsidiary) for a few years so understand a bit about Russian culture. It was a bank and our Head of Security and Fraud was ex KGB. As he told me once over a few vodkas, you’re never ex. I liked the Russians although they are a fairly suspicious bunch for good reason.
Benefits of invading? Bit like Ukraine. Larger population, get the old band back together, stop NATO expansion? I doubt he’ll invade particularly given his Ukraine troubles but there’ll be plenty of sabre rattling and soft power interference.
Not heard of Bezmenov. I’ll look him up. Thanks. Our bank worked with Bill Browder of the Hermitage Fund who had some interesting stories about Putin.
I'm curious why anyone believes the idea this administration will get a second term.
It's a vast majority on a paper thin rice pudding skin of votes.
The worst FPTP distortion of the electorate's voting intentions we've ever seen. The Electoral Reform Society have excellent graphics for that. And results for a more proportional system not dependent on candidate preference ranking so it retrofits the real data.
If the idea of 10 years is a scare tactic, we should stop immediately.
Project fear doesn't work anymore.
They've cried wolf too many times.
We should pivot to a forensic dissection of ongoing errors and their lack of attention to important issues. Turn their gaslighting to our advantage.
Followed up with positive solutions and optimistic ideas which will be in stark contrast to Starmer's gloomy adenoidal doom mongering.
The confected row about X / Twitter in the very first month of this government was deliberate, to pave the way for the inevitable banning of media that won’t co-operate, or accept heavy content regulation, all because of “hate speech” etc. And in their desperation they will ban the use of VPNs that can circumvent the social media ban unless the VPN is regulated by Ofcom.
Starmer & Co are all too aware of the risk that social media present to their fascist programme and that they have therefore must be brought under State control. All for our own protection, of course.
Watching Labour screw it up is one thing. Building a winning party or coalition for the next election is another sadly.
There’s no doubt that social media has made it much easier electorally to overturn a huge majority and to win big. That’s the good news. And there’s a lesson for both Reform and the Tories in the LD success of chucking the kitchen sink at winnable seats only.
If the fight back is going to start now, there must be a coalition like 2019 between Farage and the next Tory leader. Reform can definitely win big in the red wall, the eastern coastal seats and S Wales but have no chance in the Tory heartlands. I can only see one Tory leader being able to work with Farage and that’s Jenrick who has also been endorsed by David Starkey which is a positive for me.
The future of the UK or what’s left of it, will be at stake in 2029 (I can’t see an early election with this kind of mandate but I can see Starmer being replaced by Rayner). It’s essential that the centre right get their act together for the by elections that will crop up in Labour seats.
Good content as always - what I think the last two elections show us is the volatility of voting. There are virtually no 'core votes' or 'safe seats' anymore and though your analysis is fundamentally right come 2029 it'll be a question of deciding whether to hold your nose and vote the Tories back in or concluding that they're two cheeks of the same arse and taking whatever medicine is necessary.
The necessary work can only take place from opposition as government confers this sort of 'false security' that everything is ok. As for the phantom 'far right' we need to communicate regularly and loudly that any 'far right' in the Uk is absolutely tiny, confined to a very, very small number of people and not even taking part in elections as far as I can see.
If the economy goes tits up he might just begin to push rejoining the EU as a way out, but in the meantime 'the right' badly needs to get its shit together. We're in 'last chance saloon' territory.
We need to take ownership of the terms they use to manipulate the Overton window. We start with a list of all the things professional politicians proclaim as far-right. It will quickly become obvious that moderate views are hidden in the clutter. That will pull the teeth on the whole thing.
Our membership of the CPTPP would make rejoining the EU difficult, but that's just a hunch. Pile in with arguments either way.
Will Starmers power base be undermined by Trumps re- election (if he makes it to the White House)?
Will TR s imminent return to the UK unbalance Starmer and the
politicisation of the police, legal system and even the security forces?
Everything that is happening in the UK and EU stems from the USA. Corporate America holds the key to catastrophic political decisions that have been made.
Mass immigration, press interference, involvement of security forces in domestic affairs, alienation of whites, two tier policing/ judiciary.
We live in an almost despotic state with despotism common around the world.
Islamic states appear more prone to authoritarianism than most.
Could that be why Islam is being given favourable status in Western Europe?
I often take issue with some of your posts but I'm 100% with you on this one. We're clearly on the correct 'side' but don't always agree on the size or shape of scapel we must use to excise the tumour. Not here but elsewhere I've argued that it doesn't matter what tools, votes we use to rid ourselves of this Labour Party in name only - hereafter LINO. You would remove Reform from the equation, I would remove the LibDems who offer little more than Labour lite with their weathercock policies, their mood swinging like those prone to the cycles of the Moon.
Cooper, under the auspices of her lawyer leader, is demonising erstwhile typical Labour voters as guilty of public affray before the charges are even heard. Imprisoning a tiny tip of an angry iceberg will have further repercussions when ankle tags, curfews and community service such as graffiti removal, pothole repairs would have served. Who are they now going to look to upon release? Better they look to Farage than Tommy R. I suspect the underside of the iceberg, friends, families and associates, those not caught, will not be looking to Badenoch, Davey, Starmer, LGB or Islam.
Yes we are all on the road to hell in a hand cart. The only hope is that we are more than the loony left. We have to come together and argue for our freedoms. TTK is a joke but wants to shut us all up and lock us down. He has no answers so we must promote the answers. I think the right leaning and thinking will succeed in the UK as Marxism will not work here.
Someone is rashly optimistic today (spelling mistakes give the game away). Maybe you’re right. I expect enough of the media and midwit liberals will stay in check in terror of the rise of the far right to keep the show on the road for a while. Lenin stayed in power for 80 years without an economic recovery to boast of. Starmer is also helped by having no opposition - the far right on the internet doesn’t count. Harris may win and reinforce the narrative. On the other hand, Labour’s coalition is fragile. The woke, the Islamists and the chattering middle classes. The first two have other political homes. The last may turn when their lifestyles suffer. Maybe power cuts, and tent cities in Islington will do the trick. Who knows, but whatever happens will be unpleasant for all of us.
We await for the penny to drop for the midwit liberal social media commentators, regarding the nature of the "adults" and their "clients". Can't help thinking that they are revelling in the anarcho tyranny being visited on the working class tho. They lap up the slop think of "far right", it suits their lazy world view. All revenge for brexit I suppose, which acts as camo for their classism.
Labour are effectively mid-level bureaucrats in positions of political power. In the view of a bureaucrat there is no problem that cannot be solved by another form preferably completed in triplicate. Give them political power and there is no problem that cannot be solved by another law. They are completely out of their depth.
There is ample evidence that there are no serious grown ups in Westminster just low grade, preening, ignorant, out of touch, cosmetic, self-centred, cowardly, virtue signalling incompetents.
Yeah. There are no intellectuals of the calibre of Barbara Castle, Frank Field or Denis Healey left in the Labour Party. It says something when you consider that the intellectual heavyweight of the party is probably Wes Streeting. I'm living in hope that this awful Starmer regime is in fact the last flatulent whimper of the Labour party in the UK before they are consigned to the history books.
I’m increasingly of the same view as Peter Hitchens that both major parties are in their death throes. I don’t see a comeback for the Tories which is very worrying as Labour have to be removed, and Labour are destroying the country while they destroy themselves. Even in the week since this post was made we’ve plumbed new depths. This time foreign policy showing us to be an unreliable partner to Israel and the US which will come with a cost and Rayner’s thoughts on right to buy. Every time Labour touch something they manage to make it worse.
Lol. Come off the fence why dontcha. 🤣
"You can't on the one hand tell the public ..." - Probably you can. Laura Dodsworth: '...a government advisor told me that the behavioural scientists are “very pleased with themselves” and “Britain is seen as leading the way in how to manipulate people. There is skipping in Whitehall corridors. The public have been proved to be incredibly sheepish..."'
Is there a date for that quotation... I rather suspect it's worn off!
November 2021 - I see no reason to believe that it no longer applies.
I've always liked " things are never as good as you think they are - things are rarely as bad as you think they are".
Except, I fear that, given the current environment, thing's really are as bad as 'we' think they are.
I anticipate the current Muppet show or as Pete's father says ' regime' to get progressively worse - based on economic performance in the UK ( Reeve's being a genuine lightweight with little understanding of what growth measures are or how to achieve it) & those pesky external events in the EU & beyond but which have significantly more impact on the UK given the multiplier effects.
That things have gone so badly, so quickly for the Labour regime isn't a good portent - maybe it will be Red Ed , the bacon gurning energy secretary who will do for Labour given the exorbitant costs of imported energy and increasing lack of resilience in any form of energy generation.
Harold Macmillan’s maxim will do for Starmer. “Events, dear boy, events” will bring Starmer down, because he is not in control of ‘events. They will mount up and his hubris, authoritarianism and inflexibility will do for him.
I sincerely hope you are right.
If Sweden and Denmark are valid parallels, violent crimes against women will likely continue to rise.
The tax base will collapse as the 1 percent of tax payers who pay 30 percent of the tax take start to migrate. Even small numbers will, mathematically, have a disproportionate effect.
Energy prices will very likely continue to rise in price under Milibland.
A multi-EV fire in the basement of an upscale apartment block will burn so hot and so long it weakens the reinforced concrete pillars which form the foundations. This will create a toxic fallout zone and severe backlash from the insurance industry.
If all that comes true, my question is this: How does a government with a huge majority actually fall under our system? I really don't know the answer.
Unfortunately I think there’s only the answer that you already know which is that a government doesn’t fall through incompetence provided it can win no confidence votes. So they can only be removed at the next election. I’ve drafted some thoughts below on how we prepare for that and get this lot out. The Tories are becoming more electable every day Labour spend in office and Reform are the only ones with a sensible policy on immigration unless Jenrick wins for the Tories.
Jenrick is a "One Nation" Cameronite who is simply spouting what he thinks those still left as MPs want the party membership to hear. If he gets to lead the party it's straight back to the centrist/liberal democrat position which caused them to be wiped out in the first place.
Why did he resign as immigration Minister in Sunak’s government in that case? He’d hardly be calling to leave the ECHR if he was a Cameroon? People are entitled to change their minds and my judgement is that Jenrick has done that. Maybe I’m wrong but if I’m right he’s the best bet.
Much handwringing across the media as people realise we have unwittingly elected a Trotskyite communist to browbeat us all into submission. But what's worse is that their parliamentary majority will keep thin power for a full term and likely a second term since the Tory party has effectively been emasculated by the soft socialists who now control it.
We're doomed I'm afraid. I'm making plans to leave the UK before they bolt the door to stop the huge flight of people and capital out of the country.
Spot on, Sausage.
Hugely dependent on whether you have kids or not. If you don't, the US might still be a good bet, especially if the Republicans win in November. Even if they don't, there will still be a large number of libertarian leaning (in politics and spirity) in that country for a long time. If you do have kids, there is the school vaccination schedule to reckon with.
All round, I reckon Japan may be a good long term bet - I expect they will be the first country in the developed world to exit the demographic crisis, hopefully unaided by third world immigration. Also it's a proper country unlike Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong and city state type places.
In Europe; Denmark or Norway. Sweden and Finland are too woke and have too many immigrants from undesirable countries.
In all cases, moving is easier said than done.
Russia. Putin is offering temporary residency to any westerners who renounce the western liberal agenda. Previously, you had to learn some Russian in advance. That requirement has been dropped. I'm in the USA until the end of September. Then I'll looking seriously at moving to Russia on my return. There are some really interesting videos on YouTube of western people who are living there. Safe. clean, low crime, men are men, women are women. property and living essentials are affordable. It's not the gangster capitalist free for all that it was 20 years ago. Moscow and St Petersburg are modern cities with a functioning legal system.
Interesting.
Isn't Russia still Big Brother territory, where your card is marked for even minor dissent?
Don't forget the poison-tipped umbrellas. ;) If you upset someone there, retribution is swift. I just, but is it true that you elect the person to govern you that you're told to elect, or else? Was there any opposition to Putin?
I do admire Putin's stance on the liberal West. Our 'anything goes' tolerance has become our downfall, and yes, I feel I should urge my adult children to leave the oppressive dung-heap the UK is fast becoming. Starmer, in a few short weeks is the epitome of a tyrant.
"Things can only get worse."
LOL, any westerners settling in Putinland will get a bit of a shock when they're served their conscription papers
As myself a British/Canadian, I suspect Canada may actually be a better bet than you think. An election is due in 15 months, which I really can't see Trudeau winning, and Poilievre's Canada is a much more enticing prospect than Starmer's Britain.
Hungary and the Baltic States? That’ll bring a new definition to “safe haven” when Putin invades! I agree with you that the other countries in five eyes are as off the wall crazy as us.
I worked in Moscow (travelling to a subsidiary) for a few years so understand a bit about Russian culture. It was a bank and our Head of Security and Fraud was ex KGB. As he told me once over a few vodkas, you’re never ex. I liked the Russians although they are a fairly suspicious bunch for good reason.
Benefits of invading? Bit like Ukraine. Larger population, get the old band back together, stop NATO expansion? I doubt he’ll invade particularly given his Ukraine troubles but there’ll be plenty of sabre rattling and soft power interference.
Not heard of Bezmenov. I’ll look him up. Thanks. Our bank worked with Bill Browder of the Hermitage Fund who had some interesting stories about Putin.
I'm curious why anyone believes the idea this administration will get a second term.
It's a vast majority on a paper thin rice pudding skin of votes.
The worst FPTP distortion of the electorate's voting intentions we've ever seen. The Electoral Reform Society have excellent graphics for that. And results for a more proportional system not dependent on candidate preference ranking so it retrofits the real data.
If the idea of 10 years is a scare tactic, we should stop immediately.
Project fear doesn't work anymore.
They've cried wolf too many times.
We should pivot to a forensic dissection of ongoing errors and their lack of attention to important issues. Turn their gaslighting to our advantage.
Followed up with positive solutions and optimistic ideas which will be in stark contrast to Starmer's gloomy adenoidal doom mongering.
Applause for the addition of the 'adenoidal' slur. I like it.
I loathe the man.
The confected row about X / Twitter in the very first month of this government was deliberate, to pave the way for the inevitable banning of media that won’t co-operate, or accept heavy content regulation, all because of “hate speech” etc. And in their desperation they will ban the use of VPNs that can circumvent the social media ban unless the VPN is regulated by Ofcom.
Starmer & Co are all too aware of the risk that social media present to their fascist programme and that they have therefore must be brought under State control. All for our own protection, of course.
Watching Labour screw it up is one thing. Building a winning party or coalition for the next election is another sadly.
There’s no doubt that social media has made it much easier electorally to overturn a huge majority and to win big. That’s the good news. And there’s a lesson for both Reform and the Tories in the LD success of chucking the kitchen sink at winnable seats only.
If the fight back is going to start now, there must be a coalition like 2019 between Farage and the next Tory leader. Reform can definitely win big in the red wall, the eastern coastal seats and S Wales but have no chance in the Tory heartlands. I can only see one Tory leader being able to work with Farage and that’s Jenrick who has also been endorsed by David Starkey which is a positive for me.
The future of the UK or what’s left of it, will be at stake in 2029 (I can’t see an early election with this kind of mandate but I can see Starmer being replaced by Rayner). It’s essential that the centre right get their act together for the by elections that will crop up in Labour seats.
Good content as always - what I think the last two elections show us is the volatility of voting. There are virtually no 'core votes' or 'safe seats' anymore and though your analysis is fundamentally right come 2029 it'll be a question of deciding whether to hold your nose and vote the Tories back in or concluding that they're two cheeks of the same arse and taking whatever medicine is necessary.
The necessary work can only take place from opposition as government confers this sort of 'false security' that everything is ok. As for the phantom 'far right' we need to communicate regularly and loudly that any 'far right' in the Uk is absolutely tiny, confined to a very, very small number of people and not even taking part in elections as far as I can see.
If the economy goes tits up he might just begin to push rejoining the EU as a way out, but in the meantime 'the right' badly needs to get its shit together. We're in 'last chance saloon' territory.
We need to take ownership of the terms they use to manipulate the Overton window. We start with a list of all the things professional politicians proclaim as far-right. It will quickly become obvious that moderate views are hidden in the clutter. That will pull the teeth on the whole thing.
Our membership of the CPTPP would make rejoining the EU difficult, but that's just a hunch. Pile in with arguments either way.
All true Peter.
Will Starmers power base be undermined by Trumps re- election (if he makes it to the White House)?
Will TR s imminent return to the UK unbalance Starmer and the
politicisation of the police, legal system and even the security forces?
Everything that is happening in the UK and EU stems from the USA. Corporate America holds the key to catastrophic political decisions that have been made.
Mass immigration, press interference, involvement of security forces in domestic affairs, alienation of whites, two tier policing/ judiciary.
We live in an almost despotic state with despotism common around the world.
Islamic states appear more prone to authoritarianism than most.
Could that be why Islam is being given favourable status in Western Europe?
I often take issue with some of your posts but I'm 100% with you on this one. We're clearly on the correct 'side' but don't always agree on the size or shape of scapel we must use to excise the tumour. Not here but elsewhere I've argued that it doesn't matter what tools, votes we use to rid ourselves of this Labour Party in name only - hereafter LINO. You would remove Reform from the equation, I would remove the LibDems who offer little more than Labour lite with their weathercock policies, their mood swinging like those prone to the cycles of the Moon.
Cooper, under the auspices of her lawyer leader, is demonising erstwhile typical Labour voters as guilty of public affray before the charges are even heard. Imprisoning a tiny tip of an angry iceberg will have further repercussions when ankle tags, curfews and community service such as graffiti removal, pothole repairs would have served. Who are they now going to look to upon release? Better they look to Farage than Tommy R. I suspect the underside of the iceberg, friends, families and associates, those not caught, will not be looking to Badenoch, Davey, Starmer, LGB or Islam.
Yes we are all on the road to hell in a hand cart. The only hope is that we are more than the loony left. We have to come together and argue for our freedoms. TTK is a joke but wants to shut us all up and lock us down. He has no answers so we must promote the answers. I think the right leaning and thinking will succeed in the UK as Marxism will not work here.