It's time to look after our own people

The main text of this post appears below this picture. Before we get stuck in, I want you to take a hard look at it. This is the real Britain now.

As many readers will know, I am currently an active member of the Homeland Party, and I’ve been working closely with the top team on policy. This has been more of a collaborative effort and though I’m not calling the shots, I am certainly having my say. A lot of the work from my manifesto went into the immigration and remigration policy and a lot of my thinking also went into the housing policy.

The housing policy diverges from my own thinking on the matter of social housing. That part was very much influenced by Homeland’s Steve Laws, who is very much a socialist. Initially, I wasn’t keen. Social housing seldom keeps up with demand, and thus has to be rationed according to need, and when that happens, you get a race to the bottom to qualify for it.

The argument tilts, though, when you remove excess demand and free up housing through remigration. At the very least, we’re talking about remigrating five million people. I am a lot less hostile to the idea of social housing if we are at least looking after our own people - which is something we are categorically not doing.

This is where my thinking has been shaped by membership of the party. I’m increasingly using the term “our own people” in place of “British people”, because that’s what I’m talking about now. Policy must put our own people first, and that does not include foreigners who happen to have secured qualifying paperwork through lax controls on immigration. I no longer have the generosity of spirit to call people British when they very clearly aren’t - and give us every signal that they don’t even want to be British.

I think the turning point for me was the last general election in which we saw the likes of Naz Shah MP giving election addresses in Urdu, and seeing how northern urban politics was not dominated by the decay and Dickensian squalor, but by an ethno-religious conflict in the Middle East. Nothing better encapsulates this than the illustration above. Our own people come last. We’re not even represented in our own democracy.

Worse still, we are now spending close to ten billion a year on benefits for foreign born people and billions more housing illegal immigrants. We also see that around half of social housing in London is occupied by those born outside of the UK. Meanwhile, parts of our country are now, without exaggeration, derelict.

Last weekend I had the displeasure of spending the weekend in Mexborough. The town, I am told, was once a proud mining town but now it’s a posterboy for urban decay. The residential streets aren’t faring much better. The nearby Windhill council estate is squalid, litter strewn and neglected. There is no evidence of working class pride. Working class culture in these areas seems to revolve around people destroying themselves with alcohol. Our people need help but they are last in the queue. Labour would rather send money to fuel a forever war in Ukraine or lavish vast sums of cash on Mauritius than invest in their traditional heartlands.

A party that was at all interested in the welfare of its own people would consider this a national emergency. With two million unemployed and several million working age people considered economically inactive, written off on disability benefits, there is no reason that I can think of that we should be importing more people, and especially not low-IQ third worlders. They are only needed by industry which does not want to pay the going rate or train our own people.

When it comes to housing, education, and health, our own people aren’t even an afterthought. Go into any city hospital for an appointment and the chances are you’ll be waiting behind foreigners who barely speak English, and the good jobs in the hospital will be occupied by foreigners while working class Brits do the skivvy work and administration.

It is then easy to see why birth rates of our own people are collapsing. The modest English dream of having a decent, secure job, and a house large enough to raise a family in, having the basic provisions our parents took for granted, is now a pipedream. Our people have lost hope and quietly drink themselves half to death, leading sadder, lonelier lives, living among the ruins of a once great civilisation.

The chief beneficiaries of this decline are foreigners who can gradually colonise Britain and replace us. They are not here to integrate, and they don’t want to, and given the state we’re in, you can hardly blame them.

Meanwhile, our imbecilic politicians will talk about literally anything but the real problems facing our country. As Pakistani and Arab men rape their way through the post-industrial North, we are told that generic “misogyny” is the problem and, of course, it’s working class white boys who are need of a stern finger-wagging lecture.

You may be reading this and thinking it’s hackneyed populist shtick, and you’d be right. It is. But it is nonetheless true. Our economy is rotten. Our politics are rotten. Our country is rotting and our people are dying. It comes down to one single factor. Our rulers are completely indifferent.

To our politicians, every problem in the world beyond our shores is more important than Mexborough, Hartlepool or Worksop. They’d rather be rubbing shoulders with Volodymyr Zelensky than one of their own. Of course, our people are still needed as cash cows to finance their narcissistic delusions, but that is our only function.

What I want to see is a restoration. There are millions of people in Britain who should not be here. There are at least 2m illegal immigrants and many more who gained citizenship through loopholes and chain migration. The Tory party talks about assimilation and integration but the bottom line is that we cannot assimilate low-IQ third worlders and we don’t want them here. Integration simply does not exist. It is a fiction. We have enough problems of our own without having to manage migration that was never wanted in the first place.

Beyond that we need to see real investment in adult vocational education, housing and regeneration. We need a government that will govern Britain as a homeland.

___

I've become a lot more hardline on immigration in the last couple of years. I'm saying things lately that I wouldn't have imagined saying ten years ago. This is because it's now abundantly clear that the Wesminster establishment does not believe in the concept of nations or borders, and the prevailing mindset is that Britain is little more than a neoliberal grazing strip, open to all comers. And, naturally, we're expected to fork out for any hapless biped with their hand out, regardless of whether they've contributed.

None of the immigration of the last eighty years was for our benefit. We are told the Windrushers were invited to rebuild Britain after the war but this isn't true. Parliament just didn't have the good sense to close the loopholes that allowed Jamaicans escaping a collapsing economy to come here. Pakistanis were brought in as cheap labour since women wouldn't work night shifts and unionised men demanded fair pay. It was scab labour - and it still is. It has always been about wage suppression and propping up GDP, regardless of the effect on GDP per capita.

Alarmingly, there is little resistance to this. The public has been conditioned to passively accept their own demotion as citizens of their own country. Voicing any objection is to be considered racist. This is the product of decades of indoctrination. We were told diversity makes us stronger when in fact multiculturalism has resulted in an atomised, ghettoised low-trust society. The British government has been utterly oblivious to the harmful effects of importing low-IQ third worlders with backward values.

All the same, it was easy to browbeat the British people into accepting their ethnic replacement by conflating nationalism with Nazism. Being that the British victory over the fascists is central to our post-war national identity, such narratives have been resoundingly successful at squashing any nativist sentiment. The reason we're seeing a rebirth of populist nativism in Europe is because those WWII narratives don't hold the same grip over zoomers. WWII to them is a historical obscurity, just as WW1 was to my generation.

Still though, political power resides with the boomers and early gen Xers, most of whom are marinated in the doctrine of "anti-racism". "anti-racism", as such, is not a personal ethic, rather it is a virtue-signalling mark of teen rebellion against a perceived racist establishment (even though the establishment was already marinated in multiculturalist dogma from the eighties onwards). This was little more than brainwashing to accept infinity levels of third-world immigration.

That brainwashing has been accompanied by an insidious campaign to undermine any meaningful sense of nationality. I recall how in 2012 we were compelled to accept a Somalian Olympian athlete as a British hero who is just as British as you or me. Britishness ceased to be a meaningful concept, and became an identity anyone can adopt provided they have the right paperwork, just as porn-addled men can identify as women by donning a dress and slapping on make-up.

Having fundamentally demoralised the people, having trampled on their history and made them ashamed of their accomplishments, the state has successfully persuaded our people to accept their own oblivion.

Being that most people rarely stop to audit and reassess their own politics, they still trot out lazy tropes about being "enriched by diversity", even when they can see with their own eyes that Britain is increasingly turning into a violent third-world slum where the basic conventions of a high trust society are collapsing around them.

The conditioning in their formative years compels them to turn a blind eye to it - and defend the regime to the extent they will turn a blind eye to mass grooming and endemic misogyny - and will accuse anyone who dares to break their conditioning of being racist. That's how society enforces conformity.

As such, being performatively "anti-racist" is not only a signal of narrative conformity - for the purposes of social acceptance in polite society, it's how the feeble-minded assure themselves they are good people - so they at least feel good about themselves as they passively accept their own replacement and living in third world squalor.

Grown-ups, on the other hand, can still deplore racism against the individual, while recognising they have a right to a homeland of their own, that they do not have to share with inferior backward cultures. As was put to me yesterday, the difference between medicine and poison is dosage. That's how I feel about immigration. A society can continue to function with managed levels of culturally compatible immigration, but will collapse when expected to absorb infinite immigration of low-IQ third worlders who barely comprehend the notion that women have the right to walk the streets unmolested.

This was already a serious issue prior to the Boriswave, but now we're being replaced in our own homeland, it has become an existential matter, where soon those notional "British values" of secular tolerance, democracy and enlightenment will no longer exist, leaving us to live in Balkanised sectarianism and low grade civil war. As such, to continue to suppress your own critical faculties in order to be seen as "anti-racist" is not the mark of a "decent human being". It's just retarded.