Discussion about this post

User's avatar
george hancock's avatar

The denial of benefits will be an obvious and effective way of persuading migrants to go back BUT if you don’t think this will lead to violent protest as well as acts of terrorism you live in a more passive world than me.

Any acts to encourage remigration will have violent consequences, it can’t be avoided.

No remigration also has its violent consequences (anti terrorist forces arresting suspects yesterday?).

We are already on a rocky road whatever decisions are made.

It’s reported that Labour have made a deal with India bringing in migrants with the migrants and employers paying no national insurance taxes for 3? years (unprecedented and appalling) which will make that road infinitely more dangerous.

Expand full comment
Orak's avatar
2dEdited

To quote Milton Friedman, "The government has NO intentions; only PEOPLE have intentions."

So the question of whether uncontrolled immigration is a symptom of a collapsing State apparatus, or a result of general incompetence, or even a long well-thought-out plan? It's probably all of the above, as different groups of people inside the government try to push their own agendas.

Half a billion pounds of EU funding says maybe there was a plan, under the Asylum Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF). No idea if this is still active (govt page last updated in 2024, so perhaps). But this stuff also needs to be ditched, so the people in government can, at least, start singing the same tune. Either admit they are paying vast amounts of money to bring people in. Or admit they are trying to do something to stop people being brought in!

Here's a video discussing some of these government awards:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SMK9Fdni44

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts