No sooner had I declared my intention to down tools for Christmas, I find myself reanimated over a debate between Connor Tomlinson and Daniel Finkelstein.
This is an excellent piece with genuine intellectual depth. The sort of article now conspicuously missing from supposedly conservative journals like the Spectator and Unherd. Merry Christmas.
I remember when Rachel Riley decided to campaign against antisemitism in the days when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader, she quickly decided that she also needed to campaign against islamophobia. Attempts to educate her about islam fell on deaf ears. British jews need to realise that diversity is fatal for them as well as for everyone else who isn't a supporter of jihad.
We need more people like you. Nationalist, honest and measured who calm turbulent seas and help us lesser beings navigate our way through the storms of today.
Good post, but I do wish you wouldn’t subscribe to the divisive cultural Marxist generational wars (Boomer, Zoomer, Gen X et al). It is purely used by The Blob to divide the opposition to its March through the
Yes, I don't recognise his sweeping generalisations about a particular age group. I think it's because Pete North wants to appeal to a younger generation, quite rightly, but this isn't a good way to do it. Why alienate people who are broadly on your side?
While I generally agree with what you say there is a difference between an ethno English state and a Jewish one which is that Judaism is a religion. So the creation of the state of Israel, as a reaction to the Holocaust, in a predominately Muslim region was asking for trouble.
Giving the Jews a home land in 1948 is no different to giving the Sikhs or any other religious group their own sovereign country and if we had these new countries would have had as many troubles as Israel has had and is having.
However having said that Israel is not going away and we must now live with it and work with them on the important basis that they are only democracy in the region.
In 1948 The Middle East was more diverse than today. For example, Lebanon was largely Christian and Iran largely Parsi/Zoroastrian. They could not gave known that Islam would conquer so much of the Levant.
Connor made his points without once suggesting Jews were targets for remigration, so I'm wondering why this entire article is dedicated to defending Jews from far right Nazi grade ethnats. If Pete regards ethno-nationalism as long over-due in the UK it would be good to hear more about what type and why.
I see a future where Israel could be crucial allies for us. This anti-Semitism is a foolish distraction from serious thought.
Merry Christmas Pete
This is an excellent piece with genuine intellectual depth. The sort of article now conspicuously missing from supposedly conservative journals like the Spectator and Unherd. Merry Christmas.
I remember when Rachel Riley decided to campaign against antisemitism in the days when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader, she quickly decided that she also needed to campaign against islamophobia. Attempts to educate her about islam fell on deaf ears. British jews need to realise that diversity is fatal for them as well as for everyone else who isn't a supporter of jihad.
Great article, Peter, thank you.
We need more people like you. Nationalist, honest and measured who calm turbulent seas and help us lesser beings navigate our way through the storms of today.
Keep it up and have a happy Christmas.
Good post, but I do wish you wouldn’t subscribe to the divisive cultural Marxist generational wars (Boomer, Zoomer, Gen X et al). It is purely used by The Blob to divide the opposition to its March through the
institutions.
Yes, I don't recognise his sweeping generalisations about a particular age group. I think it's because Pete North wants to appeal to a younger generation, quite rightly, but this isn't a good way to do it. Why alienate people who are broadly on your side?
'White people will one day no longer exist. Its just
a matter of time. Who cares?' - Ed Krassenstein
While I generally agree with what you say there is a difference between an ethno English state and a Jewish one which is that Judaism is a religion. So the creation of the state of Israel, as a reaction to the Holocaust, in a predominately Muslim region was asking for trouble.
Giving the Jews a home land in 1948 is no different to giving the Sikhs or any other religious group their own sovereign country and if we had these new countries would have had as many troubles as Israel has had and is having.
However having said that Israel is not going away and we must now live with it and work with them on the important basis that they are only democracy in the region.
In 1948 The Middle East was more diverse than today. For example, Lebanon was largely Christian and Iran largely Parsi/Zoroastrian. They could not gave known that Islam would conquer so much of the Levant.
Connor made his points without once suggesting Jews were targets for remigration, so I'm wondering why this entire article is dedicated to defending Jews from far right Nazi grade ethnats. If Pete regards ethno-nationalism as long over-due in the UK it would be good to hear more about what type and why.
Connor will give it the big talk but the Church of Rome will tell him "diversity is your strength" and he will shut up again.